Philosophy Atlas

How Thinkers Disagree
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme

Philosophy of Science

Named arguments and positions that concern scientific method, explanation, theory change and the demarcation of science from non-science: falsificationism as Popper's criterion that a genuinely scientific claim must be falsifiable, the incommensurability of scientific paradigms as Kuhn's thesis that successive paradigms cannot be directly compared on shared standards, and the Duhem-Quine thesis as the holist claim that no single hypothesis can be tested in isolation from the web of auxiliary assumptions around it. Belongs here: a formulated argument or named position whose target question is what makes an inquiry scientific or how scientific theories are tested and replaced. Does not belong here: a specific scientific theory or finding itself, tracked as its own kind of entity on this atlas or on Science Atlas via the ruling 631 seam, rather than as a philosophical argument-position about method.

Facts
Comparison
Era of Emergence
20 1
Cultural Origin Tradition
German 1
Cultural Origin Tradition
Austrian 1
Browse By
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Philosophy of science
Wikipedia
  • Philosophy of science, lead section, emergence sentence
    While philosophical thought pertaining to science dates back at least to the time of Aristotle, the general philosophy of science emerged as a distinct discipline only in the 20th century following the logical positivist movement.
  • Philosophy of science, lead section, Vienna/Berlin Circle sentence
    the Berlin Circle and the Vienna Circle propounded logical positivism in the late 1920s.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.