Named arguments and positions that concern scientific method, explanation, theory change and the demarcation of science from non-science: falsificationism as Popper's criterion that a genuinely scientific claim must be falsifiable, the incommensurability of scientific paradigms as Kuhn's thesis that successive paradigms cannot be directly compared on shared standards, and the Duhem-Quine thesis as the holist claim that no single hypothesis can be tested in isolation from the web of auxiliary assumptions around it. Belongs here: a formulated argument or named position whose target question is what makes an inquiry scientific or how scientific theories are tested and replaced. Does not belong here: a specific scientific theory or finding itself, tracked as its own kind of entity on this atlas or on Science Atlas via the ruling 631 seam, rather than as a philosophical argument-position about method.
Facts
Comparison
Era of Emergence Cultural Origin Tradition Cultural Origin Tradition Browse By
Sources
1. Wikipedia: Philosophy of science
WikipediaPhilosophy of science, lead section, emergence sentence
While philosophical thought pertaining to science dates back at least to the time of Aristotle, the general philosophy of science emerged as a distinct discipline only in the 20th century following the logical positivist movement.
Philosophy of science, lead section, Vienna/Berlin Circle sentence
the Berlin Circle and the Vienna Circle propounded logical positivism in the late 1920s.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.