Philosophy Atlas

How Thinkers Disagree
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Arguments and Positions

Indeterminacy of Translation

Philosophy of Language

W. V. Quine's thesis, developed in Word and Object (1960), that for any language there exist multiple complete manuals for translating it into another, all compatible with the totality of speakers' observable behaviour, yet not equivalent to one another in what they assign as meaning. Quine's gavagai example imagines a field linguist hearing a native speaker say gavagai on seeing a rabbit; the evidence cannot decide between translating it as rabbit, undetached rabbit part, or rabbit-stage, since each hypothesis fits the same stimulus conditions equally well. Quine drew from this a broader scepticism about determinate meaning and synonymy as objects of scientific inquiry, holding that meaning is at most a matter of behavioural evidence, not a further fact translations either capture or miss.

Facts
Origin Year
1960 1
W. V. Quine, Word and Object, 1960, chapter 2.
Connections

Associated With

Source Willard van Orman Quine (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

In Branch

Sources
1. Willard van Orman Quine (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
  • Willard van Orman Quine, section on indeterminacy of translation
    Willard Van Orman Quine (1908-2000) worked in theoretical philosophy and in logic.
  • Willard van Orman Quine, on chapter two of 1960
    Quine introduces the general idea of indeterminacy, in Chapter Two of (1960), without explicitly distinguishing the two
  • Associated With: Willard Van Orman Quine
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

Choose a year to see this entry's facts and connections as the atlas records them at that moment: what it held then, what it held instead, and what it had not yet adopted. Choose Present for the current record.