A Scottish philosopher, historian, and essayist, and the most influential of the British empiricists, who argued that all the materials of human thought ultimately derive from sense impressions. Hume held that causation is not something we perceive directly in the world but a habit of the mind formed by observing one kind of event constantly followed by another, a claim that raises what came to be called the problem of induction: past regularities give us no strictly rational guarantee that the future will resemble the past. He applied the same empiricist scepticism to the self, arguing that introspection reveals only a bundle of fleeting perceptions and never a single unified soul behind them, and to religion, where his essays and posthumously published Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion subjected the argument from design to sustained criticism. His moral philosophy grounded ethics in sentiment rather than reason, holding that reason alone can never motivate action and is, in his own phrase, the slave of the passions.
Facts
TraditionBritish Empiricism, Scottish Enlightenment 3 Connections
Associated With
Hume's Treatise and Enquiry give the classical statement of compatibilism.
Source Compatibilism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Source Is-Ought Problem (Wikipedia)
Source Problem of Induction (Wikipedia)
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Critiqued Here
Immanuel Kant, Philosophers Kant credited Hume's skepticism about causation and induction with interrupting his own dogmatic slumber, and wrote the Critique of Pure Reason partly to answer it by grounding causation in the mind's own structuring of experience rather than in either pure reason or habit alone.
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
In Branch
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Influenced By
Source George Berkeley (Wikipedia)
Locke's empiricism, grounding all ideas in experience, is the direct predecessor Hume's own empiricism builds on and radicalizes.
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Works Attributed
Source A Treatise of Human Nature (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Wikipedia: David Hume
WikipediaLead, opening sentenceQuote, Lead, opening sentence
David Hume (; born David Home; 7 May 1711-25 August 1776) was a Scottish philosopher, historian, economist and essayist who is known for his highly influential system of empiricism, philosophical scepticism and metaphysical naturalism.
View the Source 2. The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
Cambridge University Press, 1995
3. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and InformationQuote
His approach generated innovative theories of human understanding, knowledge, belief, emotion, moral and political practice, and other areas of human endeavor.
- Associated With: Immanuel Kant, s.v. Immanuel Kant
- Influenced By: John Locke, entry: John Locke
- In Branch: Philosophy of Science, s.v. The Problem of Induction
- Associated With: Empiricism, s.v. David Hume
- Associated With: Epistemology, entry: Epistemology
- Associated With: Empiricism, entry: David Hume
View the Source A Treatise of Human Nature (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWorks Attributed: A Treatise of Human Nature, IntroductionQuote, Works Attributed: A Treatise of Human Nature, Introduction
Being an Attempt to Introduce the Experimental Method of Reasoning into Moral Subjects
View the Source Compatibilism (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Associated With: Compatibilism
George Berkeley (Wikipedia)
WikipediaInfluenced By: George Berkeley, Influence sectionQuote, Influenced By: George Berkeley, Influence section
A linear development is often traced from three great 'British Empiricists', leading from Locke through Berkeley to Hume.
View the Source Is-Ought Problem (Wikipedia)
WikipediaAssociated With: Is-Ought Problem, Lead sectionQuote, Associated With: Is-Ought Problem, Lead section
It was first articulated by the 18th-century Scottish philosopher David Hume, who saw a significant difference between descriptive statements (about what is) and prescriptive statements (about what ought to be).
View the Source Problem of Induction (Wikipedia)
WikipediaAssociated With: Problem of Induction, Lead sectionQuote, Associated With: Problem of Induction, Lead section
David Hume, who first formulated the problem in 1739, argued that there is no non-circular way to justify inductive inferences.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.