Philosophers
John Rawls
Citation Formats
General Reference
APA Style
BibTeX
An American political philosopher who taught for decades at Harvard, author of A Theory of Justice (1971), among the most influential works of political philosophy written in the twentieth century. Rawls proposed that the fair principles for a society's basic institutions are those that free and rational people would choose from behind a veil of ignorance, a hypothetical position in which each chooser is denied knowledge of their own place in society, natural talents, or particular conception of the good, so that self-interest cannot bias the choice. He argued that reasoners placed behind that veil would settle on two principles in order of priority: equal basic liberties for all, and that social and economic inequalities be arranged to benefit the least advantaged members of society, a conclusion Rawls set explicitly against utilitarianism, which he argued could justify sacrificing some individuals' basic rights whenever doing so raised the aggregate good.
Facts
TraditionTwentieth century political philosophy, liberal contractarianism 1 Cross-Tradition Connections
Associated With
Rejected Here
A Theory of Justice was framed explicitly against utilitarianism, which Rawls argued could justify sacrificing an individual's basic rights and liberties whenever doing so raised the aggregate good.
In Branch
Works Attributed
Sources
Dissenting Readings (1 dissenting reading)
Associated With: Utilitarianism
Utilitarian critics have pushed back on Rawls's own framing of the veil of ignorance as a decisive advantage over their view. The objection runs that reasoners behind the veil, facing genuine uncertainty about their own future position, would rationally choose something closer to a risk-averse form of utilitarianism rather than Rawls's maximin difference principle, so the thought experiment does not settle the argument as one-sidedly as A Theory of Justice presents it. This atlas records Rawls's own rejection of utilitarianism as the settled framing of his position, attested, while noting here that the argument was contested on its own methodological ground, not only rejected from outside it.
A dissenting reading, from a reviewerStanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Information
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.
View At A Past Year
The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.