The Social Contract, published in 1762 by the Genevan philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau under the full title On the Social Contract, or Principles of Political Right, asks how legitimate political authority can be established in a way compatible with individual freedom. Rousseau argues against the claim that monarchs hold a divine right to legislate, holding instead that only the general will of the people has the right to make law, since obeying the general will is, properly understood, a form of obeying oneself. The general will is not simply majority opinion; it requires a legislature open to every adult member of the community, restricted to enacting general laws for the common good, and Rousseau's own account of how this is meant to work has remained subject to extensive interpretive dispute. The book helped inspire political reform and revolution in Europe, especially in France, and builds on problems of commercial society Rousseau had already raised in his earlier Discourse on Inequality.
Facts
Classification
Genre / Form TraditionModern or Enlightenment 1 Publication Year Original Language Connections
Authored By
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
In Branch
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sources
1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Informationentry: Jean-Jacques Rousseau
In The Social Contract, Rousseau sets out to answer what he takes to be the fundamental question of politics, the reconciliation of the freedom of the individual with the authority of the state.
- In Category: Works
- In Branch: Political Philosophy
View the Source The Social Contract (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia, The Social Contract article, lead sectionQuote, Wikipedia, The Social Contract article, lead section
The book theorizes about how to establish legitimate authority in a political community, that is, one compatible with individual freedom, in the face of the problems of commercial society
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.