Thus Spoke Zarathustra: A Book for All and None is a work of philosophical fiction by the German philosopher Friedrich Nietzsche, published in four parts between 1883 and 1885. It follows the prophet Zarathustra, styled after the historical Zoroaster, as he delivers discourses on subjects ranging from metaphysics and war to the amorality of nature, most of them ending with the refrain thus spoke Zarathustra. The book introduced or elaborated several of Nietzsche's central ideas, including the overman, the death of God, the will to power, and eternal recurrence. Its style is deliberately analogical and figurative rather than systematic, which has produced widely differing readings of what Zarathustra's speeches actually mean even though there is broad agreement about their subject matter. The character first appeared briefly in Nietzsche's earlier book The Gay Science before becoming the center of this later work.
Facts
Publication YearFirst part published in 1883; the full four-part work was completed by 1885, with the fourth part initially printed only privately. Original Language Connections
Authored By
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
In Branch
Source Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Sources
1. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Informationentry: Friedrich Nietzsche
Thus Spoke Zarathustra is unified by following the career of a central character, but the unity is loose and picaresque-like, a sequence of episodes which arrives at a somewhat equivocal (or at a minimum, at a controversial) conclusion that imposes only weak narrative unity on the whole.
- In Category: Works
- In Branch: Ethics
View the Source Thus Spoke Zarathustra (Wikipedia)
WikipediaWikipedia, Thus Spoke Zarathustra article, lead sectionQuote, Wikipedia, Thus Spoke Zarathustra article, lead section
The protagonist is nominally the historical Zarathustra, more commonly called Zoroaster in the West.
View the Source Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.