The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy's survey of cosmological arguments for a first cause or necessary being, covering the kalam, Thomist and Leibnizian versions and the objections each has drawn.
Facts
Source TypeEncyclopedia
Sources
Cosmological Argument (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Claims Backed By This Source (8 claims)
This source backs 8 claims across the atlas. As facts: 5 well-attested. As cited relationships: 1 holds. Plus 2 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.
Disposition By Topic
- Arguments and Positions, 6 claims: 3 well-attested, 1 holds, 2 general references.
- Sources, 2 claims: 2 well-attested.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.