Philosophy Atlas

How Thinkers Disagree
Sources

Xunzi (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Academic Reference (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

Facts
Publisher
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Source Type
Encyclopedia
Reliability Tier
1
Sources
Xunzi (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Claims Backed By This Source (17 claims)

This source backs 17 claims across the atlas. As facts: 10 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 holds, 1 critiqued Here. Plus 3 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Philosophers, 8 claims: 3 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 1 holds, 1 critiqued Here, 1 general references.
  • Articles, 6 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 general references.
  • Sources, 3 claims: 3 well-attested.

Scholarly debate

2

Philosophers

Holds

1

Philosophers

Critiqued Here

1

Philosophers

Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.