Philosophy Atlas

How Thinkers Disagree
Concepts

Qualia

KWAH-lee-uh, singular quale, KWAH-lay

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

The subjective, qualitative character of a conscious experience, the particular way it feels from the inside to see a certain shade of red, taste coffee, or feel a pain, as distinct from any description of the physical process producing it. The difficulty qualia pose for a purely physical account of the mind was sharpened by a widely discussed 1974 paper asking whether a physical, functional description of a bat's echolocating brain could ever tell us what it is like to be a bat, and concluding that it could not: a mind could know every physical fact about a bat's nervous system and still not know that. The question of whether qualia can in principle be explained in physical terms, or whether they mark a genuine limit on physical explanation, is often called the hard problem of consciousness, distinguished from the easier, though still difficult, problems of explaining how the brain performs particular cognitive functions.

Facts
Disputed
Origin Year
1929
The term traces to earlier twentieth century philosophical usage; its best known statement is the 1974 paper on bat experience referenced in the description.
Cross-Tradition Connections

Associated With

Nagel's 1974 paper What Is It Like to Be a Bat? is the concept's best known statement.

In Branch

Sources
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy
Stanford University, Center for the Study of Language and Informations.v. Qualia
Quote, s.v. Qualia
the introspectively accessible, phenomenal aspects of our mental lives. In this broad sense of the term, it is difficult to deny that there are qualia.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.