Philosophy Atlas

How Thinkers Disagree
Sources

The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy

Reference Work

Citation Formats

General Reference

APA Style

BibTeX

A single volume reference work covering the vocabulary, figures, schools, and problems of philosophy across the Western and, in its later editions, non-Western traditions.

Facts
Publisher
Cambridge University Press
Publication Year
1995
Source Type
Reference Work
Reliability Tier
1
Sources
The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy
Cambridge University Press, 1995
Claims Backed By This Source (34 claims)

This source backs 34 claims across the atlas. As facts: 20 well-attested, 3 scholarly debate. As cited relationships: 1 critiqued Here. Plus 10 entities citing it as a general reference with no single fact or relationship attached.

Disposition By Topic

  • Philosophers, 16 claims: 9 well-attested, 1 scholarly debate, 1 critiqued Here, 5 general references.
  • Works, 9 claims: 4 well-attested, 2 scholarly debate, 3 general references.
  • Sources, 5 claims: 5 well-attested.
  • Concepts, 4 claims: 2 well-attested, 2 general references.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0 open reader challenges)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.

View At A Past Year

The atlas records no dated fact of its own for this entry, so there is no other year to choose.